Every PWS responsibility · named lead · proven approach

3.1-a

Foreign-market branding playbook with host-government sensitivity classification

Scope: Country-by-country branding-risk grading; visibility protocols by host-country profile; safety-of-personnel framing.

Drawn from Maurice's six-country Foreign Service career and Kevin's overlapping FAS tenure.

3.1-b

America First framing playbook for U.S. domestic audiences

Scope: Plain-language messaging connecting U.S. farmers, ranchers, and processors to the program's value chain; positions FFP within the current administration's bilateral co-investment doctrine (State Department America First Global Health Strategy template) — away from open-ended grants and toward time-bound, jointly-financed agreements with recipient-country co-investment and glide-path self-reliance.

Kevin's current consulting practice transitioning international development programs from give-away to business-focused models; Audrey's Wall-Street capital-markets and Georgetown SFS International Economics credential brings the deal-architecture framing; Maurice's 2007–09 food crisis interagency task force grounds the institutional voice.

3.1-c

Beneficiary recognition framework

Scope: Mechanisms by which beneficiaries recognize the American people's role, consistent with host-country safety constraints.

Built from in-country execution experience across Pakistan, Afghanistan, Thailand, Nigeria, and China.

3.2-a

Cargo Preference Act compliance trade-off analysis

Scope: Lifecycle cost of preposition vs. emergency-cycle procurement under Cargo Preference Act 1954/2005 amendments; commodity-monetization market-assessment overlay for non-emergency Title II.

Maurice directly executed CCC GSM-102 commodity movement at scale ($300M) from Islamabad. Kevin's Food for Progress monetization market-assessment methodology informs the destination-market analysis for monetized commodities.

3.2-b

Domestic specialty-formulated commodity manufacturing capacity

Scope: RUTF, fortified blended foods, specialty soy product availability; lead-times and surge capacity.

First P.L. 480 soybean program in Pakistan directly informs domestic specialty-soy product framing.

3.2-c

Positioning-site lifecycle costing and shelf-stability windows

Scope: Storage, rotation, depreciation, and write-off scenarios across major positioning archetypes.

Cost modeling tied to historical drawdown patterns and emergency-cycle activation triggers.

3.3-a

Risk assessment with limited information

Scope: Framework for scoping FFP operations where standard pre-engagement diligence is unavailable.

Anchored on Maurice's execution of the first U.S. wheat export to Taliban-led Afghanistan from his Islamabad post.

3.3-b

Third-party monitoring decision criteria

Scope: When third-party monitoring is appropriate; contract architecture; cost-benefit framework.

Drawn from FAS cooperator-program oversight experience.

3.3-c

USDA international field office relationship architecture

Scope: Where activities and field office reside in different countries, how the field office supports.

Six-country Foreign Service career provides direct operational fluency with the FAS posting network.

3.4-a

Multi-factor weighted-scoring methodology

Scope: Need severity, accessibility, host-government cooperation, U.S. strategic interest, commodity-supply alignment, program-history continuity, destination-market monetization viability, and bilateral co-investment readiness (capacity of recipient government to commit measurable counterpart contributions under the administration's America First doctrine).

Maurice's Deputy Administrator role at FAS Office of Global Analysis (75 analysts) anchors the methodology. Kevin's Food for Progress commodity-monetization market-assessment work contributes the destination-market dimension. Audrey's capital-markets deal-architecture experience contributes the bilateral-co-investment readiness dimension — directly aligned with the State Department's 31-MOU bilateral health-agreement template now being extended across foreign-aid programming.

3.4-b

Contingency-reserve formula

Scope: Historical drawdown patterns + seasonal risk windows + supply-chain lead times; not just financial inputs per PWS.

Quantitative framework with transparent inputs that USDA can audit, reproduce, and update annually.

3.5-a

Stakeholder Relations Guide — FACG + IFRP

Scope: Food Aid Consultative Group and International Food Relief Partnership engagement architecture.

Kevin's Cotton Council International and U.S. Grains Council experience translates directly.

3.5-b

Programmatic Reporting Guide — Food Aid Quality Review

Scope: Statutory reporting cadence; FAQR reporting flow; congressional reporting touchpoints.

Kevin's three FAS MAP/FMD UES submissions inform federal-reporting cadence discipline.

3.5-c

Non-Emergency Programming Planning Guide — including Title V Farmer-to-Farmer, monetization-funded programming, and bilateral co-investment architecture

Scope: Non-emergency Title II + Title V Farmer-to-Farmer integration; McGovern-Dole adjacency; Food for Progress monetization analog; deal-architecture template for time-bound, jointly-financed FFP agreements with declining U.S. share over a glide path to recipient-country self-reliance.

Kevin led the commodity-monetization piece of USDA's Food for Progress program — the sister USDA program to Food for Peace and the closest operational analog to the non-emergency Title II programming USDA will inherit. Audrey contributes the capital-markets deal-architecture pattern applied across her 40-year federal advisory career (MHPI, PPV, enhanced-use lease) — the same structural template that underpins the State Department's 31-MOU bilateral global-health agreement program ($20.6B total, with $7.8B recipient co-investment).

3.5-d

Programmatic Infrastructure Guide — IT systems and data architecture

Scope: IT infrastructure assessment; system-needs definition methodology; data-handling architecture.

HSG's AI-augmented delivery methodology informs the technology-platform recommendations.

3.6.1

Biweekly reports (Deliverable 2)

Scope: Submitted by close of business on the last business day of each two-week period.

Reports mirrored to ffp.housestrategiesgroup.com for transparent in-flight visibility.

3.6.2

Monthly COR dialogue

Scope: Written or virtual monthly engagement with the COR to discuss progress, upcoming, and issues.

Maurice serves as alternate POC and senior-escalation contact.

3.6.3

Technical Issue Coordination protocol

Scope: Formal written escalation; no scope expansion without contract modification.

Documented in the biweekly report cadence and in the AI/Expert Reconciliation Log.

3.7-a

Process-guide-anchored training curriculum

Scope: One training module per Deliverable 3–10 process guide.

Maurice and Kevin co-deliver SME-anchored modules; Jelani holds program management.

3.7-b

Competency assessment instrument

Scope: Random sampling of 80% of USDA staff engaged on FFP; 90% pass threshold.

Assessment instrument designed during months 7–9 in parallel with curriculum development.

3.7-c

Post-engagement reference archive

Scope: All process guides, training materials, and assessment instruments archived to portal for USDA post-engagement reference.

Section 508 / WCAG 2.1 AA conformant; deliverables transferred to USDA per PWS 9.0.